Sciency Words: Orbital Resonance

Sciency Words MATH

Sciency Words is a special series here on Planet Pailly celebrating the rich and colorful world of science and science-related terminology. Today, we’re looking at the term:

ORBITAL RESONANCE

Three of Jupiter’s moons, Io, Europa, and Ganymede, have a special relationship with each other. For every complete orbit of Ganymede, Europa completes exactly two orbits, and Io completes exactly four. This relationship is known as an orbital resonance.

To be more specific, Io, Europa, and Ganymede’s 4:2:1 relationship is called a Laplace resonance in honor of Pierre-Simon Laplace, the astronomer who first noticed it.

Galilean moon Laplace resonance animation 2.gif

As the moons pass each other, they pull on each other gravitationally. This would happen with or without the resonance, but the resonance means these gravitational interactions are more regular and repetitive than similar interactions between other passing objects in space.

The persistent gravitational tug-of-wars between these three moons helps keep their interiors warm through a process called “tidal heating.” As a result, Ganymede and Europa appear to have oceans of liquid water beneath their surfaces. Meanwhile, poor Io keeps spewing sulfur all over itself.

Resonances can play an important role in shaping the rest of the Solar System as well. We’ve already seen how resonances with Jupiter created the Kirkwood gaps in the asteroid belt. A similar process created the gaps in Saturn’s rings, and a 3:2 resonance between Neptune and Pluto ensures that the two planets celestial objects won’t crash into each other.

It’s also worth noting that the Solar System is full of not-quite-perfect resonances. Earth and Mars almost have a 2:1 orbital resonance, as do Uranus and Neptune. Jupiter and Saturn almost have a 5:2 resonance. And Callisto (another of Jupiter’s moons) is so close to joining the resonance party. So close! It almost has a 7:3 resonance with Ganymede. (This list could go on for a while.)

Maybe some of these resonances and near-resonances are pure coincidence. But it’s hard to believe they all are. There’s something about gravity that makes planets and moons want to resonate with each other. Science fiction writers might want to keep that in mind while designing new star systems.

P.S.: It’s sometimes mistakenly assumed that Io, Europa, and Ganymede routinely “meet up” on the same side of Jupiter. In reality, whenever two of these moons line up with each other on the same side of their host planet, the third is always somewhere else—frequently the exact opposite side of the planet.

 

Sciency Words: Rubble Pile

Sciency Words BIO copy

Sciency Words is a special series here on Planet Pailly celebrating the rich and colorful world of science and science-related terminology. Today, we’re looking at the term:

RUBBLE PILE

“Rubble pile” is not a formal part of any asteroid classification system, but it appears so often in scientific literature about asteroids that it deserves special attention. A rubble pile asteroid is really multiple asteroids tenuously held together by their own gravity.

Jy11 Hello Rubble Pile

Rubble piles probably form in the aftermath of asteroid collisions. When two asteroids smash into each other, gravity starts pulling the resulting debris back together again. A rubble pile can then form in as little as a few hours.

Since they’re not single, solid objects but conglomerations of multiple objects, rubble piles tend to have empty spaces inside them. This lowers the overall density of the asteroid, which helps astronomers distinguish rubble piles from regular “monolithic” asteroids.

Rubble piles have a minimum rotation period of approximately two hours. If they start spinning faster than that, they’re liable to fling themselves apart. However, astronomers have observed some rubble piles rotating faster than they should be able to, suggesting that additional forces besides gravity may help hold them together.

Exerting even a tiny force on a rubble pile could cause the thing to break apart. You can’t easily land on a rubble pile’s surface for mining purposes, and deflecting a rubble pile from a collision course with Earth would be tricky. As a result, rubble piles could pose many challenges to humanity in the future.

Links

Potentially Dangerous Asteroid is Actually a Pile of Rubble from Space.com.

Cohesive Forces Prevent Rotational Breakup of Rubble-Pile Asteroid (29075) 1950 DA from Nature.

Rubble-Pile Asteroid from The Worlds of David Darling.

* * *

Today’s post is part of asteroid belt month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.

 

Sciency Words: M-Type Asteroids

Sciency Words MATH

Sciency Words is a special series here on Planet Pailly celebrating the rich and colorful world of science and science-related terminology. Today, we’re looking at the term:

M-TYPE ASTEROIDS

Previously on Sciency Words, we examined carbonaceous (C-type) and siliceous (S-type) asteroids, the most common and second most common asteroid types, respectively. We now come to the third most common type. Unfortunately, this is where nomenclature gets complicated.

Astronomers currently use at least two different systems to identify and categorize asteroids: the Tholen classification system and the SMASS classification system. The two systems overlap in some ways and diverge in others. What Tholen calls an M-type asteroid is, in SMASS, mixed into a broader category called the X-group.

I’d guess that eventually one of these classification systems will “win.” Either that or a new system will replace them both, simplifying matters. In the meantime, an M-type asteroid by any other name would smell as sweet.

Characteristics of M-Type Asteroids

The M in M-type stands for metallic. It’s unlikely that an asteroid of pure (or nearly pure) metal could form by itself. Therefore, M-type asteroids are assumed to be the metal cores of larger asteroids or maybe even dwarf planets that, for one reason or another, broke apart.

Most M-types seem to be composites of iron and nickel with traces of other metals—including precious metals like rare earths and platinum group metals. You can expect to find these valuable metals in much higher quantities than you would on Earth.

Jy07 Wealthy Asteroid
A typical M-type asteroid could be worth billions upon billions of dollars.

If someone were to capture one of these asteroids and safely bring it back to Earth, that someone would become extremely rich.

Or maybe not…

The Problems with Asteroid Mining

Before you hop into your personal spacecraft and fly out to the asteroid belt hunting for M-types, a few notes of caution:

  • There’s no way to know the exact composition of an M-type asteroid based solely on observations from Earth. There’s no guarantee that you’ll find substantial amounts of valuable metals.
  • M-type asteroids can have wildly different orbits from each other, making some much harder to reach than others. Fuel costs will stack up rapidly, seriously cutting into your profits.
  • M-types are basically solid lumps of metal. You’ll need more than a pickaxe or jackhammer to crack them open. The difficulties associated with mining operations will also seriously cut into your profits.

And yet it’s hard to resist the lure of M-type asteroids. Businesses in existence today (not some far-off Sci-Fi tomorrow) are greedily eyeing M-types, trying to figure out how to go get one. That may soon become a driving force in human space exploration. Or the hunt for M-type asteroids could turn into a huge economic bust.

Just something science fiction writers might want to think about.

Book Recommendation

Asteroid Mining 101: Wealth for the New Space Economy by John S. Lewis. There are plenty of books and articles out there about asteroid mining, but this one takes a serious look at both the pros and cons of the idea. If this is a subject that interests you, Asteroid Mining 101 offers a well-balanced view of the future of the asteroid mining industry.

* * *

Today’s post is part of asteroid belt month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.

Sciency Words: Siliceous Asteroids

Sciency Words MATH

Sciency Words is a special series here on Planet Pailly celebrating the rich and colorful world of science and science-related terminology. Today, we’re looking at the term:

SILICEOUS ASTEROIDS

It’s a tale of two asteroids, one in the inner asteroid belt, the other in the outer region.

Jy05 Two Asteroids Part 1

Both asteroids started off much the same but wound up quite different. The inner belt asteroid, being closer to the Sun, got blasted by the solar wind, losing many of its lighter materials: water, organic compounds, other volatiles…

Jy05 Two Asteroids Part 2

The outer belt asteroid, being farther away from the Sun, still feels the solar wind’s effects, but less so.

And so one asteroid becomes a carbonaceous asteroid, retaining many of the lightweight materials that are so appealing to life and perhaps some day asteroid mining corporations. The other became a siliceous asteroid.

Jy05 Two Asteroids Part 3

Siliceous asteroids, also known as S-type asteroids or sometimes stony asteroids, are basically great big rocks. They’re composed of a mixture of silicon with additional metals and/or minerals. Astronomers estimate 15-20% of asteroids in the Solar System are siliceous, and most reside (not surprisingly) in the inner asteroid belt.

If you’ve seen Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, you should have some idea what siliceous asteroids look like. They’re a lighter color than their carbonaceous cousins, making them a bit easier to spot against the dark backdrop of space. They also tend to be reddish brown or sometimes greenish brown, depending on which combinations of metals and minerals they contain.

However, since they’re depleted of water, carbon, and such, it’s unlikely siliceous asteroids could host large populations of mynocks, as seen in Star Wars. They’re also not the most exciting prospects for future asteroid mining operations. Not when there are far more valuable M-type asteroids out there, which will be the subject of next week’s edition of Sciency Words.

Links

Asteroid Mining from Astronomy Source.

Asteroid Mining 101: Wealth for the New Space Economy by John Lewis.

* * *

Today’s post is part of asteroid belt month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.

Sciency Words: Carbonaceous Asteroids

Sciency Words PHYS copy

Sciency Words is a special series here on Planet Pailly celebrating the rich and colorful world of science and science-related terminology. Today, we’re looking at the term:

CARBONACEOUS ASTEROIDS

As the name implies, carbonaceous asteroids (or C-type asteroids) have lots of carbon and carbon-containing compounds. Around 75% of the asteroids in the Solar System are believed to be carbonaceous, with most located in the outer asteroid belt. They’re dark in color, sort of like giant lumps of coal, which makes them difficult to find against the inky blackness of space.

But perhaps the most interesting thing about carbonaceous asteroids is that they can support life.

Jy02 Skeptical Asteroids

Bear with me a moment. Some scientists think life in our Solar System may not have originated on Earth or Mars or any planet. Instead, life may have begun on carbonaceous asteroids.

These asteroids contain many of the carbon-based molecules (including amino acids) necessary for life. They also generally have water ice, and at least when the Solar System was young, they would have retained plenty of heat.

And yet, the idea of life evolving and thriving on an asteroid is a bit of a stretch. Carbonaceous chondrite meteorites (fragments of carbonaceous asteroids that fell to Earth) show no signs of past or present biological activity. As a point of comparison, some meteorites originating from Mars offer at least circumstantial evidence of Martian life.

However, carbonaceous asteroids could become useful to life in the future. Space faring civilizations may want to harvest these asteroids for their resources, especially water, which could be used either for drinking or, if separated into hydrogen and oxygen, as rocket fuel. One large carbonaceous asteroid could keep a spaceship and its crew going for a long, long time.

At the very least, carbonaceous asteroids could provide valuable fuel for the imagination of a science fiction writer. What might happen if, while mining carbonaceous asteroids for their resources, we discovered that they do support life after all?

Links

Asteroid Mining from Astronomy Source.

Abodes for Life in Carbonaceous Asteroids? from Icarus.

Why Haven’t We Found Evidence for Life Starting in Asteroids? from the Planetary Society.

* * *

Today’s post is part of asteroid belt month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.

 

Sciency Words: Entomophagy

Sciency Words BIO copy

Sciency Words is a special series here on Planet Pailly celebrating the rich and colorful world of science and science-related terminology. Today, we’re looking at the term:

ENTOMOPHAGY

If you want to live on Mars, you may have to get used to this term. It combines the Greek words for insect and eating. Yes, my friends, we’re talking about eating bugs.

Why Can’t We Eat Beef on Mars?

Keeping humans well fed will be one of the biggest challenges for Mars colonization (or frankly any long-term settlement off Earth). First off, you won’t have access to beef. Cattle require way too much grazing land.

The initial colony on Mars will likely only have a few small greenhouses to provide all their food. There simply won’t be room to spare for cows, pigs, or chickens. That also precludes having things like milk, cheese, and eggs.

It may be possible to raise fish on Mars. Loach and tilapia are sometimes included on the Mars diet menu. As a seafood fan, I’m all for that, but finding enough water for the required fish tanks could prove problematic.

Do We Really Need to Eat Insects?

Compared to more traditional barnyard animals, insects look like a much better option for feeding hungry colonists. Many insect species have already visited the International Space Station, so we know they’re okay with low or no gravity environments.

Insects don’t require much room. They can live in our tiny greenhouses and even help decompose plant waste like dead leaves, stems, and other inedible vegetable matter. In fact, we may have to bring insects with us anyway to help keep our plants healthy.

Best of all, insects convert almost everything they eat into insect protein. Very little nutrition is lost as it moves along the food chain.

So who else is ready to go to Mars and eat a handful of crickets?

Couldn’t We Just Be Vegans?

Plenty of people here on Earth survive without any animal protein whatsoever. No beef, chicken, dairy, tilapia, or even crickets. Some of these people assure me that they feel healthier on a vegan diet, and I have no reason to doubt them.

Maybe veganism would work on Mars, but the idea raises some concerns. With only a small number of greenhouses, the first colonies on Mars might not be able to supply a sufficiently diverse range of vegetables. Mission planners have therefore struggled to prepare a menu that doesn’t include at least some form of animal protein.

So entomophagy is something that both mission planners and science fiction writers alike might want to think about when designing future colonies on Mars or elsewhere.

Links

Entomophagy as Part of a Space Diet for Habitation on Mars from the Japanese Rocket Society.

Space Diet: Daily Mealworm (Tenebrio molitor) Harvest on a Multigenerational Spaceship from the Journal of Interdisciplinary Science Topics.

Predicting Mars Cuisine: Grasshoppers with a Side of Fungi from Space.com.

* * *

Today’s post is part of Mars month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.

 

Sciency Words: Yestersol

Sciency Words MATH

Sciency Words is a special series here on Planet Pailly celebrating the rich and colorful world of science and science-related terminology. Today, we’re looking at the term:

YESTERSOL

In the course of my research, I sometimes stumble upon new words that just make me smile. Sol is the technical term for a Martian day, a period of roughly 24.6 hours. Knowing that, I’m sure you can guess what yestersol means.

The term yestersol was apparently coined during NASA’s Spirit and Opportunity rover missions. Scientists and engineers assigned to those missions had to sync their work schedules to Martian time, screwing up their sleep cycles, eating habits, and no doubt many other aspects of their personal lives. This was necessary because the rovers could only operate during Martian daylight hours.

Additional new terms include “tosol” for today and several versions of tomorrow, such as “nextersol” and “solmorrow.”

In the distant future, Earth time may well be retained as an interplanetary standard, but each colonized world will probably develop its own version of local time, along with playful local terminology like yestersol.

Another timekeeping idea that made me smile appeared in Robert Zubrin’s book The Case for Mars. Zubrin suggests dividing Mars’s 687 day-long (or 669 sol-long) year into twelve months based on the twelve Zodiac constellations. So Martian months may end up having names like Sagittebruary, Leotober, or Cancricember.

These months would be significantly longer than Earth’s, but they could be made to correspond with Martian seasons in a manner similar to Earth’s calendar. Martian colonists may find that convenient. Also, who wouldn’t want their birthday (I mean birthsol) to be something like Sagittebruary the 49th?

When world building in science fiction, it can be tempting to either adhere to the familiar Earth calendar or try to impose some sort of intergalactic standard time on everyone. But it might be more fun (and perhaps more true to life) to think about how different communities spread across space might track time in their own unique ways, using their own colloquialisms like yestersol.

Links

Yestersol from Word Spy.

Martian Language: Where Curiosity Can Take You from A Way with Words.

Workdays Fit for a Martian from the Los Angeles Times.

Long Day at the Office as Scientists Get in Sync with Mars from the Sydney Morning Herald.

* * *

Today’s post is part of Mars month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.

 

Sciency Words: Opposition and Conjunction

Sciency Words PHYS copy

Sciency Words is a special series here on Planet Pailly celebrating the rich and colorful world of science and science-related terminology. Today, we’re looking at two related terms:

OPPOSITION AND CONJUNCTION

Admit it: you want to go to Mars. Despite all the radiation and sandstorms and saltwater, you still kind of want to do it. But which way is it to Mars? Bonus credit if you can point in the correct direction right now without checking a smartphone app.

Mars, like pretty much everything in space, is a moving target. Sometimes, it’s fairly close to Earth. Other times, it’s all the way on the far side of the Sun. To make life slightly easier, astronomers have special terms to describe the positions of other planets relative to Earth.

Jn06 OppositionOpposition: Earth and Mars, as pictured above, are on the same side of the Sun, almost perfectly lined up. In this situation, Mars is said to be “in opposition.”

Jn06 ConjunctionConjunction: Mars is now on the far side of the Sun, basically as far from Earth as it can get. Mars is now said to be “in conjunction.”

In my mind, these terms would make more sense the other way around. Mars should be in opposition when it’s on the opposite side of the Sun, don’t you think? But I’m guessing this all originates from a more geocentric view of the Solar System. Opposition, therefore, gets its name because the Sun and Mars are on opposite sides of the Earth.

What about Mercury and Venus? Since neither can be on the opposite side of Earth from the Sun, they’re never in opposition. Instead, astronomers use slightly different terms.

Jn06 Superior ConjunctionSuperior Conjunction: Venus, as pictured above, is on the opposite side of the Sun as viewed from Earth. This is called a “superior conjunction.”

Jn06 Inferior ConjunctionInferior Conjunction: Venus is now on the same side of the Sun as Earth. This is an “inferior conjunction.”

Of course, all this terminology can be shifted around if you want to take the perspective of a planet other than Earth. From a Venusian point of view, Earth could be in opposition or conjunction, and Martians could observe Earth to be in superior or inferior conjunction.

Knowing where planets are in relation to each other is critical for interplanetary voyages. Next week, we’ll start planning a Martian vacation, keeping an important question in mind: would you rather travel to Mars when Mars is in opposition or conjunction?

* * *

Today’s post is part of Mars month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.

Sciency Words: The Gaia Principle

Sciency Words BIO copy

Today’s post is part of a special series here on Planet Pailly called Sciency Words. Every Friday, we take a look at a new and interesting scientific term to help us all expand our scientific vocabularies together. Today’s term is:

THE GAIA PRINCIPLE

The Gaia principle (named after the Greek word for Earth) has taken on a lot of new agey, pseudo-religious connotations. We hear about life forces, Mother Earth, and the spiritual connection we humans have (or ought to have) with our planet. That’s all very interesting, but let’s set that aside for now.

As a scientific concept, the Gaia principle or Gaia hypothesis is primarily credited to James Lovelock. In the 1960’s and 70’s, while working for NASA, Lovelock wanted to understand why Earth is so tailor-made for life while other planets, especially Mars, are not.

According to Lovelock’s hypothesis, once life takes root on a planet, it fundamentally changes the environment around it. As life evolves, so too does the planet, with the planet’s environment becoming increasingly favorable to life and life becoming increasingly well adapted to the planet’s environment.

Today, all life forms on Earth exist in a symbiotic relationship with each other and with the planet, actively (though unwittingly) maintaining the planet’s life-friendly conditions. It’s almost as though Earth has become a single organisms with countless individual “cells” working to maintain homeostasis.

A strict interpretation of the Gaia principle would tell us that if life fails to alter its environment, if it fails to spread out and establish a vast and complicated planetary biosphere, then it will wither and die.

Jn03 Mars Doesn't Have a Green Thumb

Scientists are currently searching for evidence of life on Mars. Specifically, they’re looking for microbial life eking out an existence, perhaps only in one limited region of the planet.

Whether or not we accept the Gaia principle and how strictly we choose to interpret it has major implications for what we can expect scientists to find on Mars. Because if it’s all or nothing when it comes to life on other planets, as the Gaia principle suggests, then Mars looks pretty darn close to nothing.

So what do you think of the Gaia principle, and how likely do you think it is that we’ll find life on Mars?

* * *

Today’s post is part of Mars month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.

Sciency Words: Silicosis

Sciency Words PHYS copy

Today’s post is part of a special series here on Planet Pailly called Sciency Words. Every Friday, we take a look at a new and interesting scientific term to help us all expand our scientific vocabularies together. Today’s word is:

SILICOSIS

What’s the scariest thing about the Moon? Moondust.

My10 MoondustI’m glad you asked, Mr. Moon!

  • First, moondust gets all over your spacesuit. During the Apollo missions, astronauts found it was practically impossible to get all the dust off their spaceboots and spacesuits, possibly due to a sort of static cling effect. So astronauts wound up tracking a lot of this stuff back into the lunar lander.
  • Next, it gets in your air supply. Once all that moondust got into the lander, the Moon’s low gravity meant dust particles could drift about in the air a lot longer than they would on Earth—just waiting for someone to breathe them in.
  • Finally, it gets in your lungs. Roughly half of moondust is composed of fine grains of silicon dioxide. Essentially, moondust has the consistency of powdered glass. You don’t want that in your lungs.

On Earth, the inhalation of silica dust can cause a respiratory disease called silicosis. Symptoms include coughing, shortness of breath, and swelling or inflammation of the lungs. Those most at risk include miners and quarry workers, as well as anyone working in the glass manufacturing industry.

At least one astronaut reported experiencing silicosis-like symptoms while on the Moon. Future Moon missions and possible lunar settlements will likely involve longer-term exposure and higher risks of respiratory diseases.

So while this may sound like an odd piece of advise, given that the Moon is airless, please be careful about the air you breathe on the Moon.

P.S.: Silicosis or similar respiratory conditions will also be problematic for Mars missions. The surface of Mars is covered in iron oxide dust (a.k.a. rust). I for one don’t want to breathe in flecks of rust any more than I want to inhale powdered glass. Martian soil may also contain other as-yet-unidentified chemicals that could be hazardous to human health.

Links

Silicosis from MedLine Plus.

Don’t Breathe the Moondust from NASA Science.

The Mysterious Smell of Moondust from NASA Science.

Occupational Health: Lunar Lung Disease from Environmental Health Perspectives.

* * *

Today’s post is part of Moon month for the 2015 Mission to the Solar System. Click here for more about this series.